Explanation
The heap paradox asks when removing individual grains from a heap results in there no longer being a heap. It thus highlights the logically blurred boundaries between concepts.
Example
If a heap remains a heap after the removal of a single grain, this appears to hold true down to a single grain.
Counterexample
A clearly defined threshold with a precisely specified minimum number does not create a sorites problem.
Distinction
Distinguish from the slippery slope fallacy; sorites is based on vagueness and gradual indifference.
Effect on thought and perception
Highlights the tension between continuous change and categorical terms.
Resonance
Many barely perceptible transitions cause a seemingly stable category to topple.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Sorites“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-103-020. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-103-020The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.