Explanation
In noema, indirect meaning lies not in a single transferred word but in the utterance as a whole. Puttenham calls it close conceit; Quintilian describes things intended to be understood although not actually said. The term therefore denotes inferable ulterior meaning, not arbitrary unintelligibility.
Example
Your definition is remarkably free of any source. The intended meaning is that the definition is unsupported.
Counterexample
The definition is unsupported. The meaning is stated directly rather than inferred behind the surface utterance.
Distinction
Unlike enigma, which displays deciphering as a task, noema may be understood incidentally without a solving ritual. Unlike schematismus, it names the structure of indirect meaning rather than circuitous expression under a motive for concealment. Unlike implicature, it is a historical figure, not a general pragmatic theory.
Effect on thought and perception
Activates inference and attention to the gap between what is said and meant, while increasing the risk of misunderstanding.
Resonance
The spoken sentence forms a front surface; behind it, a second meaning responds once listeners establish the relation.
Cite this entry
Reich, Michael (Hrsg./ed.): „Noema“. Atlas der Sprache, AT-RHE-206-005. ATLAS 251, data model 1.6.0. https://atlasoflanguage.com/concept/AT-RHE-206-005The address remains stable; editorial content may evolve. A verified modification date per entry is not yet available. Include your access date for precise references.